Every existing method checks the document — not the part

Anything that can be separated from the physical part can be forged or transferred. This is the shared fundamental weakness of every approach currently used in aviation.

Paper certificates are forgeable

EASA Form 1 and FAA 8130-3 authenticate the paper — not the metal. AOG Technics proved it definitively: a home printer, a laptop, 60,000 forgeries. The entire system failed to detect a single one.

Non-serialized parts: the blind spot

Bolts, bushings, seals, washers, dampers — no existing system can physically identify these parts. CFM International confirmed: exactly these parts made up the majority of AOG Technics counterfeits. No current technology addresses this gap.

RFID & tags: detachable, transferable

An RFID tag can be removed from a genuine part and attached to a counterfeit. The system authenticates the tag — not the metal beneath it. The vulnerability is conceptual, not technical.

LLP documentation gaps: multi-million-dollar risk

Life-Limited Parts must be traceable back-to-birth. Every documentation gap devalues parts worth millions, jeopardises airworthiness, and creates legal grey areas in lease return transactions.

The decisive question every Quality Manager, MRO Director, and Chief Engineer must be able to answer:

"Can I prove today — beyond reasonable doubt — that the part in my hand is identical to the one recorded in my documentation chain, regardless of the quality of accompanying paperwork?"

With all existing methods, the honest answer is: Only partially. With surface fingerprint: Yes — in seconds, with absolute physical certainty.

Surface Fingerprint Technology

Every metal surface — titanium, steel, aluminium, Inconel — carries a unique microstructure created during manufacturing, random in nature, and physically impossible to reproduce. ID Systems AG captures this structure and converts it into a digital passport for the part.

ID Systems AG surface fingerprint scan: top view of an aircraft bolt. Green algorithmic contour lines capture the unique microstructure of the metal surface. The detail inset shows the sub-microscopic surface topography — the basis of the digital fingerprint that makes every part uniquely and permanently identifiable.
Green lines = digitised surface microstructure topography
Scan reference point (centre)
Inset: sub-microscopic surface topography
Actual scan image Surface fingerprint of an aircraft bolt

The green contour lines visualise the algorithmically captured surface microstructure. Each line is a unique characteristic — together they form a digital hash that identifies the part beyond dispute. The detail inset (bottom right) shows the sub-microscopic topography, which is physically impossible to reproduce even under identical manufacturing conditions. This is the fingerprint that makes every bolt, bushing or LLP uniquely and permanently identifiable.

HOW IT WORKS — 4 STEPS

01

Initial scan — non-contact, in seconds

High-precision, non-contact optical scan of the component surface. The part remains completely unchanged — no intervention, no marking, no certification obligation on the part itself. Compatible with high-volume production environments.

02

Digital fingerprint — unique and immutable

The microstructure is converted into a unique digital hash and stored securely. Compatible with blockchain systems, MRO software (AMOS, SAP), ERP, and existing aviation documentation platforms.

03

Authentication — anywhere, at any time

At every receiving inspection, maintenance check, lease return, or installation: new scan, automatic database comparison, proof of authenticity in seconds — even after years in service, after sterilisation, after disassembly and reassembly.

04

Back-to-birth traceability — EASA-compliant

Every scan adds an entry to the part's provenance chain. Complete traceability from manufacture to retirement — the physical anchor that makes blockchain documentation genuinely secure and every LLP record unassailable.

Key advantages

No marking — no intervention

The part remains unchanged. No certification obligation on the part itself. Decisive for aviation regulatory compliance.

100% counterfeit-proof

The microstructure cannot be copied, transferred, or reproduced. Zero attack surface for manipulation of any kind.

Non-serialized parts included

Bolts, bushings, seals — physically uniquely identifiable for the first time. Closes the industry's biggest authentication gap.

Material-neutral

Validated for steel, titanium, aluminium, Inconel. All common aviation alloys covered across all part categories.

Proven in regulated industries

Validated in watchmaking and medical technology (sterilisation, implants per ISO 13485) — direct transfer to aviation environments.

Blockchain-ready

The physical anchor that makes blockchain part documentation genuinely manipulation-proof and legally defensible.

Why existing solutions fall short

RFID, blockchain, laser engraving — all share the same fundamental weakness: they are separable from the physical part. What is separable can be forged, transferred, or duplicated.

Method Physically bound? Non-serial. parts? Intervention? Forgeable? Assessment
EASA Form 1 / FAA 8130-3 No — paper is separable With serial no. only No Yes — proven Inadequate
RFID / barcode / QR tags No — tag is detachable No Attach tag Yes — tag is transferable Weak
Laser engraving / Dot-Peen Partial — can be imitated Partial Yes — material change Within limits Medium
Blockchain (alone) No — no physical anchor No No No part protection Complementary
Surface Fingerprint (IDS) Yes — inseparable from material Yes — even without serial no. No — zero intervention No — physically impossible 100% counterfeit-proof

Where you generate value immediately

From incoming goods inspection to OEM manufacturing integration — surface fingerprint accompanies every part through every step of the global aviation supply chain.

Non-Serialized Parts

Highest priority

The category at the centre of the AOG Technics scandal — and the one for which no existing system provides a physical identification solution. Surface fingerprint closes this gap completely: every bolt, seal, bushing and washer becomes uniquely, permanently authenticatable for the first time — no serial number required, no marking needed.

Life-Limited Parts (LLPs)

Very high fit

Turbine blades, landing gear, brake assemblies — EASA and FAA mandate back-to-birth traceability. The fingerprint is the immutable physical anchor of that chain: even if paper documentation is incomplete or challenged, the part's identity remains provable. No multi-million-dollar LLP value is ever lost to documentation gaps again.

MRO Receiving Inspection

Deployable immediately

Deployed as an internal quality tool in receiving inspection (FAA AC 20-154), the fingerprint system requires no EASA or FAA certification on the part itself. This is the fastest path to measurable ROI: immediate start, immediate results, zero process redesign, zero regulatory lead time. The ideal Phase 1 entry point for any CAMO or Part-145 organisation.

Lease Returns & Aircraft Asset Transfers

High fit

In aircraft asset transactions between lessors and airlines, LLP verification is one of the most time-consuming and costly activities. Documentation gaps devalue parts worth millions. The fingerprint provides unassailable, physically grounded proof of part identity — independent of the completeness of accompanying documentation.

The scale of the problem — fact-based

Numbers that demonstrate: the need is real, regulatory-backed, and the window for early movers is open right now.

$87Bn
Global aviation MRO market 2025
Industry analysis 2024
520,000
Counterfeit / unapproved parts per year (est.)
FAA Advisory Circular AC 21-29D
60,000
Forged EASA certificates — AOG Technics
SFO / Southwark Crown Court, Feb. 2026
145
CFM56 engines recalled for emergency inspection
CFM International, 2023, officially confirmed

EASA Regulation (EU) 1321/2014, Art. 145.A.42

Mandates traceability for all aircraft parts used in maintenance — without specifying a technical procedure. This regulatory openness allows surface fingerprint to be positioned as an Acceptable Means of Compliance — no legislative process required, no new rulemaking needed.

FAA Advisory Circular AC 21-29D

Explicitly identifies gaps in physical authentication procedures for non-serialized parts (Suspected Unapproved Parts — SUPs), without closing them. Creates regulatory demand without supply — the precise position ID Systems AG addresses.

Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition 2024

Airbus, Boeing, GE Aerospace and Safran have formed a joint initiative and are actively seeking technology partners. Early movers gain direct access to OEM decision-makers at the highest level of the industry.

Swiss MRO cluster & FOCA advantage

SR Technics (Zurich), Swiss Aviation Services, Swiss AviationSoftware and direct FOCA access offer ideal pilot conditions. Swiss quality and regulatory credibility as a proven trust factor with international aviation clients.

From evaluation to live system — in 3 phases

Each phase delivers standalone value. Phase 1 starts without any regulatory lead time — immediately, with measurable benefits from the very first deployment.

Phase 1 · 0–12 months

MRO Pilot Project

Deployment as an internal quality inspection tool in receiving inspection. No airworthiness certification required — the system is used as a quality control instrument, not as part of official release documentation. Analogous to a calliper or borescope: neither requires a part certification. Zero regulatory risk, first ROI evidence.

Immediate start · Zero regulatory risk · First ROI proof point
Phase 2 · 12–24 months

Regulatory Recognition

Positioning as an Acceptable Means of Compliance under EASA 1321/2014 Art. 145.A.42. Engagement with FOCA and EASA rulemaking. Integration of a Designated Engineering Representative (DER). Joint application with pilot customer to establish official compliance pathway.

EASA dialogue · FOCA engagement · Joint MRO application
Phase 3 · 24–48 months

OEM Integration

Fingerprint acquisition directly at OEM manufacturing — the part receives its digital passport before it ever leaves the factory. Partnership via the Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition. Integration into OEM quality systems. Maximum chain integrity from first article to retirement.

Safran · GE Aerospace · Airbus · Boeing · Coalition

White Paper: Counterfeit-Proof Component Identification in the Aviation Industry

Comprehensive analysis for MRO organisations, airlines, aircraft manufacturers, and OEM quality teams worldwide.

  • Fact-based problem analysis — AOG Technics, FAA data, EASA regulation
  • Full comparison of all existing authentication methods
  • 4 concrete use cases with ROI perspective
  • 3-phase implementation plan — Phase 1 with zero regulatory overhead
  • Direct contact information for your pilot project
White Paper — PDF

15 pages · Fact-based · For technical and commercial decision-makers

Download White PaperPDF · Free · No form required

Also available in DOCX — request on enquiry.

Frequently asked questions

Technical and regulatory answers on surface fingerprint technology in aviation — questions commonly asked by quality managers, MRO directors, and procurement teams.

How are counterfeit aircraft parts (Suspected Unapproved Parts) currently detected?

Detection currently relies primarily on paper-based document verification (EASA Form 1, FAA 8130-3) and visual inspection. The AOG Technics case (2019–2026) proved these methods are structurally inadequate: 60,000 forged certificates passed every existing control undetected over four years. ID Systems AG surface fingerprint technology is the first method to authenticate the physical material itself — no marking, no intervention on the part, independent of document quality.

What are non-serialized aircraft parts and why do they represent a critical security gap?

Non-serialized parts — bolts, nuts, washers, seals, bushings, dampers — carry no individual serial number and are invisible to all existing digital tracking systems. They cannot be traced back-to-birth, cannot be verified against a parts history, and cannot be distinguished from counterfeits by any current physical method. CFM International confirmed after the AOG Technics scandal that the majority of counterfeit parts came from exactly this category. ID Systems AG surface fingerprint is the only scalable solution that makes even these parts physically and individually identifiable — without any marking or intervention.

Does the surface fingerprint scan modify or damage the aircraft component in any way?

No. The scan is a purely non-contact optical reading process. The part remains in its original condition — no physical modification, no marking, no intervention of any kind. This is a decisive regulatory advantage: unlike laser engraving or RFID tags, the scan system does not require any airworthiness certification on the part itself. When deployed in Phase 1 as an internal inspection tool, the system is subject to no EASA or FAA certification obligation whatsoever.

What EASA and FAA regulations govern aircraft parts traceability?

The central EASA requirement is Regulation (EU) No. 1321/2014, Art. 145.A.42, which mandates traceability for all parts used in maintenance organisations — without prescribing a specific technical method. This regulatory openness permits surface fingerprint to be positioned as an Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) without requiring new rulemaking. On the FAA side, Advisory Circular AC 21-29D (Suspected Unapproved Parts) explicitly identifies gaps in physical authentication procedures for non-serialized parts. ID Systems AG actively guides partners through the full regulatory process, including FOCA dialogue and DER engagement.

Which materials and part types is the technology validated for?

The technology is material-neutral and validated for all common metallic aviation materials: steel (multiple alloy grades), titanium (Ti-6Al-4V and others), aluminium (2024-T3, 7075-T6 and further alloys), Inconel, and other nickel-base superalloys including those used in hot-section engine components. Already proven in watchmaking (titanium, stainless steel) and medical technology (surgical steel, titanium implants per ISO 13485, fully sterilisable). Composite materials (CFRP, GFRP) can be validated within the pilot programme scope.

How does surface fingerprint differ from blockchain-based parts tracking?

Blockchain systems secure documentation records immutably against tampering — but without a physical anchor, the connection between the digital record and the physical part itself remains vulnerable. If the part has no unique physical identity, a counterfeit can be linked to a genuine blockchain record. Surface fingerprint is the physical anchor that makes blockchain genuinely secure: the surface microstructure binds the physical metal inseparably to the digital record, creating a chain of custody that is both digitally immutable and physically unforgeable. Lufthansa Technik introduced a blockchain parts documentation system in 2024 that requires exactly this kind of physical anchor to close its remaining vulnerability.

What happened in the AOG Technics case and what does it mean for aviation safety?

Between 2019 and 2023, the operator of AOG Technics issued approximately 60,000 forged EASA Authorised Release Certificates (ARCs) using a home computer and printer. He was sentenced to 4 years and 8 months imprisonment at Southwark Crown Court in February 2026. The judge described the offending as "a near-complete subversion of the aviation regulatory framework." Airlines including Ryanair, American Airlines, Delta, Southwest, TAP, WestJet and Virgin Australia were affected. CFM International confirmed 145 CFM56 engines required emergency inspection. The case demonstrates conclusively that the industry's reliance on paper-based certification is a structural vulnerability — and that physical part authentication is the only lasting structural solution.

How do I start a pilot project with ID Systems AG?

The fastest route is Phase 1: deployment as an internal quality control tool in your receiving inspection — no certification required, no intervention on parts, no process redesign needed. ID Systems AG provides structured pilot programmes with defined test scenarios, clear success criteria, and full technical support throughout. Speak directly with our technical team: info@idsystems.ch or +41 32 374 71 11. Based in Lyss, Switzerland.

Beratung

Sie sind noch nicht sicher, welches Produkt am besten für Ihre Einsatzwecke geeignet ist? Zögern Sie nicht und kontaktieren Sie uns für ein Beratungsgespräch oder für eine unverbindliche Offerte. Rufen Sie uns einfach an:   

Zentrale: 032 374 71 11